">Watch more videos on our Youtube Channel

Friday, May 18, 2012

WHY AN ALARM



As we have written, we started this journey on our website because of our concern for our democracy. We were not political. Yet the facts that were being revealed compelled us to try to express our concerns in the hope that others would become aware of the danger as we had, enabling all to take proper action.

Personally, we feel that belonging to a political party is not patriotic in that it restricts individual freedoms, constraining one within the parameters of the party.

We made the statement in We the People that the two existing political parties are no more than an Elitist country club that has conducted itself for the benefit of the powerbrokers, who with their capital have in effect been running our country at the expense of “we the people.” This is something that needs to be addressed by “we the people.”

However, something of greater concern, an even greater threat to our democracy, has surfaced. For this reason we wrote the book AN ALARM WENT OFF When I Heard ‘G.D. America’. At this time we would like to take the opportunity to share some of the foundation of our concern.

Growing up in the forties and fifties, we were disturbed by the activities of the “Weather Underground”, a movement that appeared in the sixties that displayed contemptuous hatred, even expressing the desire to do anything within their power to bring harm to the United States government and its capitalism. From our observations back then, this movement had not developed strong roots as it seemed to have disappeared rather quickly. However, then in 2008, we heard the expression “G.D. America” which shocked us into investigating the roots of that statement. As we expressed in AN ALARM WENT OFF apparently that hatred, born in the sixties, had grown like a toxic weed infecting some of our universities as well as some of our churches.

In 1971, Eric Hoffer, an American social writer who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in February, 1983, wrote in First Things, Last Things, page 71: “Nowhere at present is there such a measureless loathing of their country by educated people as in America.” How much more applicable that statement is today!

Join with us as we piece together how this all evolved.

In the sixties there developed a rebellious nature that wove its way into the fabric of our social uniform: resentment toward all authority. The 1955 movie “Rebel Without a Cause” displayed how this attitude was developing even then. It became socially acceptable to openly express hatred toward the United States government.

Some of this hatred was supported by historical facts that exposed atrocities carried out by the United States government: i.e., the Indian Removal Act of 1830. History cannot be rewritten: The treatment of the Native Americans was shameful. Davy Crockett, elected as a congressman from Tennessee in 1826 and 1828, opposed the Indian Removal Act. The powerbrokers of the day, the land speculators, were in full support of the government’s actions. They successfully used their resources to defeat his reelection in 1830.

In the expansion of its territory to the west coast, the United States was not completely innocent, either.

However, regretfully, let’s be honest: no country on the face of the earth has existed without some shameful events in their past: Germany, Russia, England, China, and on and on. As we have written, justice travels a crooked path and once achieved does not return to repair the fractured pieces of the past. Now, we as humans can only secure justice for ourselves in the present. To attempt otherwise will only inflict injustice on innocent people.

The hatred of the sixties has grown. Its strongest roots are in individuals who throughout history have displayed themselves as having a manic narcissistic intellect. They have a sense of living above the rim of humanity, feeling that the masses need to be held in check and under control, their control. The masses are pitiable and incapable of self management.

Let’s look to some of our social writers and see how they express this fact.

T.S. Elliot, The Cocktail Party, edited by London: Faber and Faber, 1974, page 111: “Half the harm that is done in this world is due to people who want to feel important. They don’t mean to do harm—but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it because they are absorbed in the endless struggle to think well of themselves.”

C.S. Lewis, God in the Dock, edited by Walter Hooper, 2002, page 292: “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.”

Eric Hoffer, The Temper of Our Time, 1967, page 83: “A ruling intelligentsia, whether in Europe, Asia or Africa, treats the masses as raw material to be experimented on, processed, and wasted at will.”

There are people who have a need to feel important. In their manic narcissistic view “they begin thinking their reasoning is divine and if anyone dares to question or challenge them they view these people as heretics or apostates.” Downtown Tommy Brown, P.S. Norac.

From the sixties, this hatred for the United States and its people has grown strong among the intellectual elite. Being socially accepted into this group requires a like contempt. There are highly educated people who have reached extraordinary accomplishments and we have no intent to diminish them or detract from their due acknowledgement when we use the term “educated fools.” However, as expressed in Intellectual Power, there are highly educated persons who due to inadequate training or natural ability lack a comprehensive approach and yet fall among those who are described as having a need to feel important. The frightful thing is they act on this need, to the detriment of others as expressed above by T.S. Elliot.

Let’s examine what is taking place today.

The thing that truly disturbs P.S. Norac is the attempt to legislate restraints on carbon emissions; supposedly for the benefit of protecting the earth and humanity. This reflects C.S. Lewis comment above: “…tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims…” Although there are thousands of scientists who have expressed that this legislation is based on flawed research and reason, tyrannically the government is still pursuing it. This has the potential of costing thousands of dollars to each family. This falls in line with the reasoning of manic narcissistic people, denying all other intellect and input. However, P.S. Norac has demonstrated their reasoning falls more in line with that of an educated fool.

As an example, trying to fortify their theory that carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas is causing global warming, they chose to use tree growth to establish a temperature history of Earth. Any comprehensive mind would deduce that there are too many variables to have success in doing this; yet these individuals in their manic state took off like a hyperventilating Odie dog, of Garfield fame, making this study, not seeing or understanding the facts. Not only are there too many variables, but carbon dioxide is a nutrient necessary in tree growth. To a comprehensive mind it is inconceivable that they did this.

The tragedy of this is that the economy and security of the entire world is being threatened by individuals with this mental deficiency.

Should we continue to allow these individuals to control and impact our economy? Since the American people are sensitive to the environment, these extremists have used the environment as a means to bring harm to the United States. We at P.S. Norac, as well as most Americans, appreciate the advancements that have been accomplished in environmental protection as well as the exposure to practices that have threatened the welfare of many of our citizens. But we shouldn’t forget that efforts that are being brought forth by the extreme left with their contempt for the American people and the United States government is not being generated from a desire to secure the ecology but from a desire to further their hate and contempt.

As a result, we get more than half of our oil from foreign sources who make no secret of their contempt for us. This has put us at the mercy of other nations and has weakened our economy and threatened our security. Imagine if we were getting most of our oil here in the United States the trillions of dollars that would be circulating within our own economy instead of enriching some already rich oil sheik. However, these extremists are comfortable with this since it brings discomfort to the object of their loathing.

Let’s take time to examine some of the framework of their reasoning.

Many on the extreme left feel that there should be a one-world government and that the United States is the biggest obstacle to accomplishing this. It can be easily demonstrated how incomprehensive their reasoning is. Although one-world government might be manifest destiny, it is only a weak mind lacking comprehension that would not understand that this is not the time. When the majority of the world has little concern for human rights, the weakening of the United States and other countries that have made such advancements in human rights would result in an unimaginable tragedy. If China or the Jihadists prevail, imagine the suffering.

The left are very narrow in their view of the world when it comes to fuel prices. They feel that since many European countries pay much more for a gallon of gas than the United States, Americans are recklessly gluttonous and should adjust to a more European style of consumption. The Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu, revealed that he concurred with this view in 2008 when saying: “Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.”

Our entire way of life and the freedom we have here in the United States is supported by having reasonable gas prices. We are not Europe. We are dramatically different. We have many rural communities that are supported by having reasonable costs in transportation. The population is too sparse to support mass transit. The incomprehensiveness of these individuals could be compared to trying to fit Shaquille O’Neal into a uniform designed for Danny Devito.

The extreme left also feels that there should be a more global even distribution of wealth. A great example of this is the proposal of Cap and Trade in which everyone would be given a certain amount of carbon credits. In third world countries, where they would not consume enough fossil fuels to use all their carbon credits, they could sell their credits to the industrialized world with the result that the global wealth would be more evenly distributed. If you take time to view this you will easily understand that the reasoning was constructed by people lacking comprehension. It compares in value to trying to use trees to establish temperature history. Anyone can see that worldwide this could never be enforced. The powerbrokers would position themselves to make great gain and the poor would remain neglected.

Richard Sandor, the brainchild of the CCX (Chicago Climate Exchange), proposed that trillions of dollars could be made from this Exchange. With Barack Obama’s coming from Chicago it is not surprising that we would hear the statement, in January, 2008: “Under my plan of a Cap and Trade system electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”

Realize that this is all based on the alleged fact that carbon dioxide is the greenhouse gas mainly responsible for the alleged global warming.

Speaking of “hyperventilating Odie dogs”, on April 24, 2012, the breaking headline news was: “Alert: ‘Gaia’ scientist James Lovelock [who in 2007 predicted Global Warming Doom: “Billions of us will die…”] reverses himself: I was ‘alarmist’ about climate change & so was Al Gore! ‘The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago’” (Published on You Tube by The Alex Jones Channel)

WHY AN ALARM?

An alarm must be sounded! It is not the Democrats. It is not the Republicans. It is the intellectually weak individuals who lack a true comprehension of reality in both parties. Of this group, those on the extreme left, with their ludicrous reasoning, i.e. that carbon dioxide is an effective greenhouse gas, have damaged and are threatening the security of all humanity.

The highly polarized individuals cannot be altered; that is not where our focus needs to be. But by bringing out these evident truths and exposing how ridiculous their reasoning is, Americans, as they always have, will adjust responsibly.

This information needs your help to be heard: Get the conversation rolling.

Forward this information as well as other pertinent information such as It’s Really Simple 1 & 2 published on www.psnorac.com to all your friends.

In line with our MO of telling stories to help people reason, we hope you are enlightened and entertained by the following:

WEALTH

Wealth does not appear in nature. It cannot be picked from a tree or harvested from a bush. It is strictly a product of humanity.

Wealth by itself is not evil; however, it has been used to empower people to do evil things. Wealth is basically a good thing. Since it is not alive, does not have any malice or intent, it does not consider justice or inequalities. It is just an “is” thing as inanimate objects are. It was from the strength of wealth that the Roman aqueducts were built, bringing benefits to all Romans, from the highest to the lowest citizen.

In reality it advances society. In the hands of benevolent individuals it brings blessings to the less fortunate. A good example of this is the stories about Gilgamesh that some feel inspired Moses to write the Book of Job. Job is portrayed as a very wealthy man with an unquestionable caring and benevolent nature. But take time to reason: if Job said to himself, I am no more than one of these poor peasants; why should I have so much, and as a result gave away all his wealth, imagine the devastating affect this would have on the community. This one act of generosity would destroy his means of future benevolent acts that would, no doubt, have benefited the community in a more sustained manner. What we are establishing is that sustained wealth can be a stabilizing benefit to the community.

Aaron Thompson was a board sawyer living in a rural, heavily forested region of Wisconsin. When the opportunity to purchase a saw mill came up, he made the move and became a small business owner.

He knew that he was a skilled board sawyer, but he quickly learned there was much more to running a saw mill than just sawing logs. Now he was faced with the need to market and distribute his product. After due consideration, he trained his sons in the complexities of being a board sawyer and struck out to market and distribute his product. Surprisingly his skill as a board sawyer was quickly overshadowed by his marketing and distributing skills. Soon, the mill was operating at high capacity, employing over 40 people.

Aaron had now cultivated a very high standard of living in the community. However, the employment of 40 plus people also benefited the community, bringing material advantage to many of the local store owners: gas stations, grocery stores and so on. Aaron was also very generous in supporting the many local charities. In fact, many of them began to depend on his generosity.

As is the nature of life, Aaron passed away. His sons now had to take over the marketing and distribution of the product as well as the physical side of operating the mill. They had become excellent board sawyers and ran the yard with efficiency; however, it was soon apparent they had not inherited their father’s marketing ability. As a result the operation began going downhill. Within a few years the mill was closed and the employees were laid off, having a devastating effect on the community. Other businesses running on a very narrow margin of profit also had to go out of business.

A large majority of American workers are employed by similar small companies. If you takes the time to drive around the United States you will see many empty buildings that were built for some business venture. This supports the fact that a lot of small businesses do not last – some for only a few months, some for a few years, some for decades and some for generations.

The wealth that was generated by Aaron’s business no longer existed: the community suffered. It is very important that small businesses are enabled to sustain their wealth for as long as possible for the benefit of the communities. As with any business there will be ups and downs in which good businessmen save capital in order to survive the low times.

Our present tax structure is not conducive to sustaining small businesses. And yet, it allows large loop holes for the large corporations to exploit. Burdening small businesses with extra taxes, whether income taxes or taxes on such things as carbon footprint or mandated employee health insurance, only discourages the entrepreneurs that America needs. Presently we have coal-fired plants that are closing because of EPA regulations based on a factor that doesn’t even exist. How can this administration say that it cares for the American people when it recklessly takes away their jobs?

TAX THE RICH

Barry had just turned 7 years old and was feeling very good. His grandfather had given him $20 for his birthday. He had never had this much money before in his life. He imagined it could buy him anything he wanted.

With a skip and a run he went next door where his best friend lived. He was eager to tell Marty about his riches. Marty’s mom was getting ready to do some shopping and asked Barry if he would like to go along. When he said yes, she called Barry’s mother and the three were on their way.

Arriving at the shopping center, Marty asked if he and Barry could go to the toy section. His mother gave permission, calling “You know what the rules are,” as the two friends bolted off. Marty was in the lead as they came to the toy aisles and turned to Barry as he pointed at a toy robot, “Can you afford this?” Barry assured him that he had plenty of money. He had Grampa’s money. They went from one toy to another planning together all the things Barry could buy with his money. Each time Barry exclaimed that he could afford to buy that with Grampa’s money.

With their window shopping done, they went to find Marty’s mother. On the trip home Barry chattered on and on about all the things he was going to get. Finally it was time to go home and Barry excitedly told his mother about all the things he was going to buy with Grampa’s money. His mother realized that Barry wasn’t dealing with reality and feared that he would be disappointed and tried to explain not to get his hopes up too far. But Barry wouldn’t listen; after all he had Grampa’s money!

We now have an administration that acts like they have “Grampa’s money,” After all, they can tax the rich. When asked if they can afford any particular project the answer comes, “Sure, I can tax the rich.” In reality, you can only tax the rich so much before you destroy the wealth that supplies the security that society needs.

THE PROPER STEWARDSHIP OF MONEY

Walter and Mary Arnold spent the first ten years of their marriage unsuccessfully trying to have a child. Finally Mary was able to carry to term and a blessing filled their life in a 7 lb 8 oz little girl they named Nancy. Unquestionably, this little girl was the love of their life. There was nothing they wouldn’t do for her.

When Nancy was 16 years old, Walter and Mary decided to buy a small Mom and Pop convenience store.  The purchase wiped out their savings and they knew they would be struggling for awhile. Walter had taken interest in a certain product line that he thought would be a potential money maker. When he called the vendor to make a purchase, the vendor asked how he would be paying. Since they hadn’t done business before, arrangements were agreed upon to pay C.O.D. until credit was established.

The morning of the delivery, Nancy bounced into the store. Her energy radiated like sunshine around her. How Walter loved his daughter. “Daddy, can I have money to buy a new skirt?” Nancy asked. “I don’t know, Nancy, money’s pretty tight right now,” Walter said, but the hesitation in his voice told her he was having a hard time saying no. “Well, how much is it going to cost?” he relented. “Twenty dollars,” was Nancy’s response. “Well, go to the cash register and take out what you need.”

It was a busy day and Walter forgot about the episode. Two o’clock that afternoon the expected delivery arrived. The driver cheerfully set up the display where Walter had prepared for it. When it was all set up it looked good. Walter went to the register to get cash for the payment. To his embarrassment he didn’t have enough. With a red face, Walter explained that he didn’t know what had happened but he didn’t have enough money to cover the bill. The driver said he would have to call in and see what his boss wanted to do.

Walter could tell from the one side of the conversation that he could hear that there was a quandary whether they should just take the product back or make arrangements. Finally, it was concluded that if Walter could come up with a third of the bill, they would leave half the product and readjust on the next delivery. Walter agreed.

After the driver had rearranged the display and left with half the product, Walter opened the cash register and started to check the receipts to find out how he could have miscalculated so badly. Walter was dismayed to find there was about $200 missing. What could have happened to $200 he thought? He started going back over the day, worried that someone must have stolen money from the register while he wasn’t looking. Then he remembered the exchange with Nancy. But she’d only needed $20 for a skirt. Well, she might have some idea what had happened to the rest, he thought.

Just then the door opened and Nancy walked into the store in a new outfit. Walter’s heart sank. He couldn’t believe his little girl would do this. “How much money did you take this morning, Nancy?” he asked. “Oh, I think about $200.” She said innocently. “$200? But you said a skirt cost $20,” Walter exclaimed. “It did,” Nancy smiled as she twirled to show off the new skirt, “but you said take what I needed and I needed a new blouse and shoes and purse to go with it. Aren’t they pretty?”

She glanced at her father and realized that something was not right. “Did I do something wrong, Daddy? I still have $50 left. Do you want it?”

Walter ran a hand over his face before explaining, “Yes, Nancy, I need that $50. I was short and couldn’t pay for that new product delivery today.”

Nancy’s face dropped, she was hurt that she had disappointed her father.

“What did you spend $150 on?” Walter asked, trying to keep calm. “Well,” she hesitated. “They had a sale on manicures at the Mall.” Walter looked at his daughter unbelievingly. “Then I needed a pedicure for my new fancy sandals,” she finished, apologetically. Walter was ready to lose it, “A pedicure!”

Nancy’s eyes watered, realizing how upset her father was.

Our government has acted with less responsibility than our teenage character Nancy. When it became evident that our economy was in deep trouble a $700,000,000,000.00 stimulus package was enacted. There were many ridiculous investments that had very little potential to create lasting jobs. It takes very little research to confirm this statement.

Considering the need to cut back on expenditures, Harry Reid was offended that his state of Nevada would suffer consequences if the January cowboy poetry festival had to be eliminated because of suggested cuts to the National Endowment of the Arts which underwrites the festival. The expenditure for cowboy poetry had less real value than our character Nancy’s need for a pedicure.

Americans are upset. They need a break from this reckless, juvenile mentality that is bankrupting our country from Washington. Using the same mentality: You said take what I needed; do we really need this type of expenditure?

THE NEXT STEP

P.S. Norac feels that the presidential election of 2012 should not be exclusively focused on the deficiencies of the Obama Administration. Disappointingly, the evidence reveals that Barack Obama has merely been the puppet of the extreme left; i.e., the Keystone Pipeline. There are thousands of miles of pipeline in the United States that are being operated safely and efficiently and creating thousands of jobs for Americans.
How can an administration say that it cares for the American people when it denies the potential jobs that would be created by this new pipeline?

Example:         During the Gulf oil crisis, when other countries came forward to offer skimmers to aid in the cleanup, this administration declined their assistance. This resulted in more damage to the coast as the oil came ashore less restricted.

Example:         This administration put a moratorium on drilling. As a result many of the oil rigs have been relocated to other parts of the world and many Americans have lost their jobs.

How can this administration say that it cares for its people when it takes away their jobs?

Example:         The extreme left has concocted the theory that carbon dioxide is an effective greenhouse gas. P.S. Norac and many others have decisively shown that this is “The Greatest Hoax” as Senator Inhofe titled his book on the subject. This hoax has created many unjustified expenditures around the world; money that could have been more effectively spent. To allow the left to pursue their desires in relationship to carbon dioxide could bankrupt many companies as well as many countries. By all appearances this would be the fulfillment of the extreme left’s anti-capitalist, anti-industrial desire. By all observations these extremists are incapable of comprehending the magnitude of the harm their actions could bring to humanity. T.S. Elliot made us aware of this: “… but the harm does not interest them. Or they do not see it, or they justify it …”

The removal of Barack Obama as president will not eliminate this threat. What is needed is a direct exposure of the extreme left’s mental deficiencies, humiliating and ridiculing them. It is time for the Democrats and the Liberals to rid themselves of these parasites that have maligned their cause. History shows that Democrats and Liberals have conducted themselves with nobility in the past.

It is our hope that some of the Super PACs will see the value of what we are saying and introduce ads that will effectively expose this detriment.

This information needs your help to be heard: Get the conversation rolling.

Forward this information as well as other pertinent information such as It’s Really Simple 1 & 2 published on www.psnorac.com to all your friends.

Thursday, April 26, 2012


Bill, Sandra and I both enjoyed hearing from you. As you read our material you see that we put a strong emphasis on parents teaching their children to reason. It is very encouraging to see you and your 16 year old daughter doing this.
Your question was where the number 2583 came from. In researching information for our story Cousin Eddy Takes on Greenhouse Gases, we turned to the article in Wikipedia entitled “Atmosphere of Earth”, which at that time reported that carbon dioxide made up 387 ppm (parts per million) of Earth’s atmosphere; that has changed slightly now, but at that time these were the figures we were working with. We subtracted 387 from 1,000,000: which came to 999,613. This gave us the ratio of 999,613 to 387. Simplifying the equation, dividing 999,613 by 387, gave us the ratio of 2582.97, rounded off to 2583, to 1.
We will be posting the following on our website: www.psnorac.com but wanted to share it with you and your daughter.
IT’S REALLY SIMPLE:
THERE ARE TOO MANY VARIABLES TO USE TREES TO DETERMINE TEMPERATURE
We recently received a letter from Bill (last name withheld for privacy). While composing my response a storyline came into mind. As a result let me tell you about Bill Allen:
Bill’s family had lived in America for centuries. His family settled here almost one hundred years before the United States was the United States. When the English came to Maine to harvest the virgin forests for needed lumber to build their ships, Bill Allen’s family was part of the communities that came into existence to support this industry. It is said that the largest city in Maine, Portland, has one of its main thoroughfares named for this activity: Forest Avenue.
The Allen family fortunes increased from one generation to the next, from a log cabin to a large brick farmhouse. This is where Bill grew up. He inherited this beautiful brick farmhouse, as well as a large parcel of land with virgin timber that had never been cut. This parcel of land had been passed along for generations, untouched, viewed as security against the future possibility that the family would experience financial hard times. As the vicissitudes of life had been kind, the Allen family had never had to cash in this resource. From generation to generation the Allen men had viewed this possession with pride, grooming the trees to assure the best quality of lumber: as another might have pride in possessing, cherishing and caring for a highly valued diamond.
Since Bill was aging he knew that his daughters, one a lawyer the other a doctor, would not have the same pride in the trees that he and his ancestors had. As a result he came to the decision to harvest these trees and have the gratification of understanding the true value of this long cherished and protected inheritance.
When the word got out about this virgin lumber being available, the lumber community was abuzz with anticipation about the quality of this timber. Bill was getting offers double and triple what he had originally expected. Then he got a strange call. Steve Watson inquired how old Bill imagined this timber to be. When Bill’s answer was “hundreds of years old,” Steve became very excited, exclaiming this was “perfect, just what we’re looking for.” Going on, Steve explained that he was a scientist and wanted to study the growth patterns of these trees. Arrangements were made for the two men to meet.
After the meeting, Bill walked into the house with a big smile on his face. His wife asked, rhetorically, “How did it go?” knowing from his expression that it had gone well.
“Well, we’re going to have enough firewood for the next few years,” was the response.
“You’re not going to turn those beautiful trees into firewood!” his wife exclaimed.
Bill grinned. “No, but as the trees are delimbed, they’ll cut the branches into firewood for us; and we’re getting over three times what I had expected per board foot.”
“Wow! They must have really wanted those trees.”
“Actually they want to study the trees to determine what the temperature had been for the corresponding years,” Bill explained. “When they explained what they were doing, I said that didn’t make sense. But they were determined and at that price I had no reason to argue.” Bill shrugged, “Just between you and me, they’re going on a fool’s errand.”
“But, they must be highly educated to have that backing!” his wife protested.
“Yeah, educated fools,” Bill grinned. “You remember about five years ago, that spring it was so cold the apple trees didn’t blossom until about two weeks after their normal flowering time? Then the weather turned so hot and dry that we really didn’t get much crop that year. Reason would say the trees didn’t grow much that year. Yet the average temperature for the year might have been on the high side, but the tree growth wouldn’t show it. The temperature around trees is completely conditional to the weather. There is no way that trees can be used to determine temperature; there are just too many variables,” Bill concluded.
It is very difficult to know these facts and understand that intelligent, educated people would not be capable of seeing this. In our article Intellectual Power we bring out the fact that there are highly educated people who do not have a comprehensive mind and that are incapable of bringing a theory to its proper conclusion. In Cousin Eddy we talked about his tendency to take off like a loose wheel, taking on a project with very little preparation and comprehension.
The question I have is: Are the Greenhouse Gas people being motivated and driven by the extreme left who have expressed their desire to bring harm to capitalism and industry? Or is it simply the lack of soundness of mind? Clearly their advancing the need for further regulations that will cause our electric bills to skyrocket demonstrates a lack of sensitivity for the common man’s ability to meet his family budget.
Please visit our Blog at psnorac.blogspot.com and comment on whether you feel the Greenhouse Gas advocates are motivated by the extreme left or do they just lack the comprehensive understanding of these common sense things?

Saturday, April 14, 2012

CARBON DIOXIDE IS A NUTRIENT



In our story DOWNTOWN TOMMY BROWN, Tommy was presented with the opportunity to make some money doing research using trees to establish a temperature history of Earth. When he reviewed all the factors he immediately concluded that this would be a "fool's errand": the facts didn't measure up.

Let's review the facts:

Greenhouse gas advocates have claimed that Earth's temperature has risen by 5 to 7 degrees since the Industrial Revolution. Let's put all the facts together to determine if the study of trees could be effectively used to prove this claim.

First, weather controls temperature. Weather is unpredictable and as a result the temperature surrounding any selected tree would not have enough consistency to be an effective tool for this study.

Second, due to the fact that carbon dioxide is a nutrient needed in photosynthesis and that studies have shown that additional carbon dioxide in the air around any plant increases its growth, it could be concluded that the additional growth could be the result of the carbon dioxide and not the temperature.


Sandra and I had a friend who had been instructed by her doctor to cut down her salt intake. She took the counsel so thoroughly that she eventually had a psychotic breakdown. The result was that she had seriously deprived her body of the needed electrolytes to keep her body in balance.

Thus we understand Leighton Steward’s concern that Cap and Trade legislation could affect Earth’s atmosphere negatively and throw it out of balance; his suggestion was that we need more carbon dioxide, not less. Leighton Steward, a noted geologist and awarded environmentalist, who at one time believed that carbon dioxide was contributing to global warming, became so concerned with what his research revealed that he testified before Congress in 2009 about the danger.

Now, let’s use high school science that even the self-proclaimed “simple man” Bill O’Reilly would understand. We constantly hear the statement “green energy”, which in my understanding implies the enhancement of the green vegetation of the earth. One necessary nutrient to increase green vegetation is carbon dioxide. The simple truth is that without carbon dioxide our planet cannot become “green”.

The destruction of the rain forests has created great concern that Earth’s supply of oxygen will be seriously threatened. Let’s put the pieces together: it requires CO2 and photosynthesis to create oxygen. The decreasing of CO2 could contribute to this threat to mankind’s supply of oxygen. 

Should we allow the unreasoning environmentalists to literally suffocate us? It has been suggested that the Earth’s supply of oxygen is presently at a depleted level. Wouldn’t it be more prudent to increase carbon dioxide to ensure that mankind has enough oxygen?

Thousands of studies have shown that increasing carbon dioxide in a plant’s atmosphere increases plant growth which in turn gives mankind its needed oxygen. We need carbon dioxide for a healthy “green” planet.

These two simple facts (1) the ratio off 2583 to 1 between Earth’s atmosphere and the amount of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere and (2) carbon dioxide is a nutrient should be enough to open the debate.

Saturday, April 7, 2012


EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE RATIO TO CARBON DIOXIDE: 2583 TO 1

When we began this mission, we were not politically active. But a few shocking statements we heard caused us to look more deeply into matters confronting our Democracy.

One of the paths we took was to look into exactly what greenhouse gases and global warming was all about. As we commenced our research, we came across a startling fact: the ratio that exists between Earth’s atmosphere and carbon dioxide is 2583 to 1. Immediately we concluded that we were being scammed: there was something wrong. However, we couldn’t believe that anyone could be that evil, so we felt there must be something we were missing. Following is a breakdown of the path we took that supports our conclusion. IT’S REALLY SIMPLE: There isn’t enough carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere to be an effective greenhouse gas.

Our research began with an article entitled “Atmosphere of Earth” in Wikipedia. The pie graphs in this article jumped out at us as we saw the dimension of the various components of Earth’s atmosphere. Something didn’t compute. Next we researched the article “Greenhouse Gas” in Wikipedia. At first glance, their explanation of greenhouse gases sounded very technical and really scientific. But in analysis we realized it did not address one of our major concerns: the ratio between Earth’s total atmosphere and carbon dioxide. In the article “The Great Global Warming Hoax?” on The Middlebury Community Network site does give some clarity to the ratio issue, justifying our concerns.

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

The GHG advocates have effectively shut down all debate.
 
This is wrong.
It’s really simple:  There isn’t enough carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere to be an effective greenhouse gas.
 
This fact is the Achilles heel of the extreme left: The crack in the wall that can be used to expose their desire to bring harm to the U.S. as clearly proclaimed by Bill Ayers.
 
Please help us hammer a wedge into this crack to expose the danger that is threatening our Democracy.
 
The world deserves it.
 
Read: IT'S REALLY SIMPLE (click at left)
 
Follow this blog as we take you step by step, using high school science to establish why we say the GHG advocates are wrong.

Saturday, March 3, 2012

An Alarm Went Off

P. S. Norac is pleased to announce the release of our new book, AN ALARM WENT OFF When I Heard "G.D. America". This is a collection of short stories and commentaries on today's social issues.



We are pleased to include in this publication the complete stories: "Cousin Eddy Takes on Greenhouse Gases"; "LARRY"; "Where Will Liberty Live"; all previously published at www.psnorac.com. As an added bonus we have included a new story entitled: "GIBBY". We invite you to read an excerpt from this story by clicking here.

We cannot emphasize too strongly the concern we feel for the future of our way of life. We invite all like-minded citizens to join with us in doing what we can to ensure a bright future for our children and grandchildren.

Please purchase a copy of AN ALARM WENT OFF When I Heard "G.D. America" from our publisher for $13.50. Please click here to purchase.

Thank you for your continued support.